It depends if you choose "Use enhanced security (SSL)" when signing into
Hotmail or not :-)

--
Peter van Houten

On the 14 May, 2010 23:30, Jeff Brown wrote the following:
I thought the hotmail reference was a total joke.  protecting
information, not having ID put together with personal medical
information is only part of the equation.  It is a violation to send pki
over the internet CLEAR TEXT, which I believe anything sent to or from a
hotmail account would fall into that category, so no matter what you did
to secure the identity of the recipient, its still a violation, right?

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Jon Harris <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Only someone that has done a lot of digging into HIPPA would know
    but that is what I thought as well.
    It is getting the correct person the password to the vault that
    concerns me.  Anyone can send an email from any account and then get
    the information.  Sending the connection information by email would
    be fine (I think) if it is was an anonymous account.  It would
    concern me if someone was to get the password for the vault that way.
    Jon

    On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:28 PM, John Aldrich
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    wrote:

        On Thu May 13 2010, you wrote:
         > No, I was just joking about the Hotmail bit. ;-)
         >
         > On 5/13/2010 5:49 PM, Jon Harris wrote:
         > > Do you really think that sending this kind of information
        thru a
         > > Hotmail/Yahoo/gmail is any better?  Maybe to send a link to
        one of the
         > > secure data transmission methods it would be an idea and
        maybe a good
         > > idea.  No owner information without a lot of digging to
        find the owner
         > > of the hotmail/yahoo/gmail account.
         > > I would second that if you do this then you have the
        receiver call
         > > into the office and get the password to the secure vaulted
        information
         > > or better yet make them come in and get it.
         > > Jon
         > >
        I really think that the combination of an "anonymous" Hotmail or
        Gmail or
        yahoo account *along with* the vault is a good solution. That
        way there's
        nothing obvious to tie it back to the original medical facility,
        in case
        there's someone "shoulder surfing" etc.

        --
        Thanks,
        John Aldrich
        Blueridge Industries
        IT Manager

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to