Rather than go to local server storage, I would recommend getting a
secondary, less expensive SATA-based iSCSI SAN to offload the data to.

It will give you more flexibility in the long run, while helping you to
minimize costs in the short run.


*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) <http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker>
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
Signature powered by WiseStamp <http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install>


On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:40 PM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote:

> What I've implemented in a small (50 user, 500GB total server space
> environment) with good success and happy users: ROBOCOPY to an archive share
> (in this case, 1TB USB HDD hung off a server). Same users allowed to RWXD on
> non-archived files have READ ONLY to the archives. File/folder structure is
> identical to "active" files. The only folders archived by the robocopy are
> the shares on the file/print servers.
>
> We're considering doing something similar at %dayjob%  with 350 users and a
> LOT more data - get old data off expensive SAN disks and onto cheaper and
> less "performance critical" local server drives.
>
> Depends on the environment and why you want to archive. In the small client
> it was to not unnecessarily pay for online backup of files that simply
> aren't THAT business critical, and those archive files are disk-to-disk
> backup to a NAS at their site 2 miles away.
>
> Yeah, doesn't help the OP AT ALL.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 3:14 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Archiving Solution
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 14:16, Mike Tellson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > My company is looking to implement an archiving solution for both file
> > servers and exchange mailboxes.  After several vendors came out and gave
> a
> > “dog and pony show” the two products that appear to be what we are
> looking
> > for are CommVault Simpana and Sunbelt’s Exchange archiver & File
> archiver.
> > Does anyone on this list have experience with either of these products?
> > What are your opinions of each (good, bad, or ugly)?
>
> I have some peripheral experience with the Sunbelt stuff - I didn't
> implement it myself, and it was given to one of my minions by the IT
> manager, which pissed me off no end.
>
>     o- Don't mix the implementation of the two products - Just.
> Don't. In particular, don't mix the archive files into the same
> directories.
>
>     o- Make sure you don't throw random crappy old hardware at it.
>
> My next points are true of any complex solution like this:
>
>     o- Don't give it to a junior sysadmin to implement.
>
>     o- Make sure you have a comprehensive plan for implementation and
> testing
>
> Specific issues that come to mind immediately:
>
>     o- We had to make exceptions for several different file types
> (.mdb, CAD drawings, and some others) because the clients couldn't
> stand the wait time for the retrieval from the archiver, and the
> client would hang, and then we'd have to unarchive the file manually.
>
>     o- Once the emails and files have been archived and mingled in
> the directories created on the archive server, there is no
> distinguishing them, in any way.
>
> We cheaped out and used an older server with poor RAID hardware for
> the OS drives, and we're still paying the price.
>
> There are other problems, but I'll leave you with a bit of philosophy:
>
>     o- Adding more disk is probably cheaper than trying to do file
> archiving. The cost of the software and the maintenance/management
> overhead almost certainly more expensive than adding more disk.
>
>     o- Email archiving is the same story with one caveat: the only
> real justification for it: Legal protection. If you need email
> archiving for regulatory compliance, customer service or contractual
> issues, you're good to go. Otherwise, don't do it.
>
> Kurt
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to