That's basically what I just did, I started using Sunbelts SEA e-mail
archiving about 14 months ago currently archiving about 5 mil emails and
about 200Gb of storage, (about 250 users), just purchased an HP NAS iSCSI
with 4 * SATA 500 GB drives, will be using it for the e-mail archiving
storage and other "slow moving" data. Takes the pressure of my Fibre SAN,
for a fraction of the cost.

Stefan

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Bob Hartung <[email protected]> wrote:

> We use Kerio Connect as our mail server. After trying a numberof
> alternatives, wechose MailStore (www.mailstore.com).
>
> - Has both a web and  software clients.
> - Superfast search
> - Flexible rules for archiving and removing emails.
> - We don't have MS mail but Mailstore has a compatible mode.
>
> Had it for about 8 months. Run on a PC. Very good software at a good price.
>
>
> ----------------------
>
> Bob Hartung
> Wisco Industries, Inc.
> 736 Janesville St.
> Oregon, WI 53575
> Tel: (608) 835-3106 x215
> Fax: (608) 835-7399
> e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]]
> To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:26:28 -0500
> Subject: Re: Archiving Solution
>
>
> > Rather than go to local server storage, I would recommend getting a
> > secondary, less expensive SATA-based iSCSI SAN to offload the data to.
> >
> > It will give you more flexibility in the long run, while helping you to
> > minimize costs in the short run.
> >
> >
> > *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) 
> > <http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker<http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker>
> >
> > *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
> > * *
> > Signature powered by WiseStamp <http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install>
>  >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:40 PM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > What I've implemented in a small (50 user, 500GB total server space
> > > environment) with good success and happy users: ROBOCOPY to an archive
> > share
> > > (in this case, 1TB USB HDD hung off a server). Same users allowed to
> RWXD
> > on
> > > non-archived files have READ ONLY to the archives. File/folder
> structure
> > is
> > > identical to "active" files. The only folders archived by the robocopy
> are
> > > the shares on the file/print servers.
> > >
> > > We're considering doing something similar at %dayjob%  with 350 users
> and
> > a
> > > LOT more data - get old data off expensive SAN disks and onto cheaper
> and
> > > less "performance critical" local server drives.
> > >
> > > Depends on the environment and why you want to archive. In the small
> > client
> > > it was to not unnecessarily pay for online backup of files that simply
> > > aren't THAT business critical, and those archive files are disk-to-disk
> > > backup to a NAS at their site 2 miles away.
> > >
> > > Yeah, doesn't help the OP AT ALL.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 3:14 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Re: Archiving Solution
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 14:16, Mike Tellson
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > My company is looking to implement an archiving solution for both
> file
> > > > servers and exchange mailboxes.  After several vendors came out and
> gave
> > > a
> > > > “dog and pony show” the two products that appear to be what we are
> > > looking
> > > > for are CommVault Simpana and Sunbelt’s Exchange archiver & File
> > > archiver.
> > > > Does anyone on this list have experience with either of these
> products?
> > > > What are your opinions of each (good, bad, or ugly)?
> > >
> > > I have some peripheral experience with the Sunbelt stuff - I didn't
> > > implement it myself, and it was given to one of my minions by the IT
> > > manager, which pissed me off no end.
> > >
> > >     o- Don't mix the implementation of the two products - Just.
> > > Don't. In particular, don't mix the archive files into the same
> > > directories.
> > >
> > >     o- Make sure you don't throw random crappy old hardware at it.
> > >
> > > My next points are true of any complex solution like this:
> > >
> > >     o- Don't give it to a junior sysadmin to implement.
> > >
> > >     o- Make sure you have a comprehensive plan for implementation and
> > > testing
> > >
> > > Specific issues that come to mind immediately:
> > >
> > >     o- We had to make exceptions for several different file types
> > > (.mdb, CAD drawings, and some others) because the clients couldn't
> > > stand the wait time for the retrieval from the archiver, and the
> > > client would hang, and then we'd have to unarchive the file manually.
> > >
> > >     o- Once the emails and files have been archived and mingled in
> > > the directories created on the archive server, there is no
> > > distinguishing them, in any way.
> > >
> > > We cheaped out and used an older server with poor RAID hardware for
> > > the OS drives, and we're still paying the price.
> > >
> > > There are other problems, but I'll leave you with a bit of philosophy:
> > >
> > >     o- Adding more disk is probably cheaper than trying to do file
> > > archiving. The cost of the software and the maintenance/management
> > > overhead almost certainly more expensive than adding more disk.
> > >
> > >     o- Email archiving is the same story with one caveat: the only
> > > real justification for it: Legal protection. If you need email
> > > archiving for regulatory compliance, customer service or contractual
> > > issues, you're good to go. Otherwise, don't do it.
> > >
> > > Kurt
> > >
> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> > >
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>


-- 
Stefan Jafs

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to