*shrug* This discussion has gone on for awhile and neither side is going to
be able to sway the other. I see no need to drag it out and keep it going
when we're just going to disagree. I've stated my position, I've tried
various examples to explain why I think it's a bad idea, and vice versa, but
neither side has budged their position. Why drag it out and risk getting
hateful over it?

You're entitled to your opinion, I'm entitled to mine. We're both entitled
to try and convince the other that they are wrong, but in the end, if we
can't convince each other, the best thing to do is agree to disagree.



From: William Robbins [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

Nice cop out.

 - WJR

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:56, John Aldrich <[email protected]>
wrote:
I think we're going to have to agree to disagree.




-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU



-----Original Message-----
From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2010 8:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU

> Here's something I thought of... Sure you'll be able to buy an "unlock"
> code, but will the end-user realize that they are getting the same
physical
> hardware as someone who pays more and know that they can unlock better
> performance? Thinking about the folks who go into Best Buy or WalMart to
> buy a new computer (this appears to be the market that this new "feature"
is
> aimed at.) My thought is that they're going to buy whatever is on the
shelf
> and not realize that they just need to buy an "upgrade"/unlock code to
enable
> better performance.
>
> How is that going to help the end-user?

As long as Walmart doesn't say that the CPU is Quad-Core, but neglect to
tell you that you have to pay extra.

If Walmart says that the CPU is dual core, 2GHz and supports VT, and it
costs $x, then why should anyone care that the CPU can do extra for
additional payment.

Cheers
Ken

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to