You realize, of course, Mr. Carpet has already said "Good Day!" right?
- WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:53, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]>wrote: > The difference being, is that you don't tend to support your opinions > (which you tend to assert strongly) with reason or facts. > > When given a solid reason that challenges your assertion, instead of > addressing it, you alter the discussion, often using analogies that merely > serve to re-state your existing opinion, rather than addressing the > underlying challenge to your opinion. > > In this case, multiple experienced people explained why this model would be > beneficial to you. Yet, AFAIK, you didn't acknowledge any of those logic > cases, and instead went for the overused car analogy, and then eventually > shifted your "argument" to being concerned that the consumer wouldn't be > adequately educated about the potential upgrade options (which is quite > different than your initial "concern"). > > "You keep making assertions that don't stand up to facts and then bail. > > Why?" > > -sc > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:19 AM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU > > > > *shrug* This discussion has gone on for awhile and neither side is going > to be > > able to sway the other. I see no need to drag it out and keep it going > when > > we're just going to disagree. I've stated my position, I've tried various > > examples to explain why I think it's a bad idea, and vice versa, but > neither > > side has budged their position. Why drag it out and risk getting hateful > over > > it? > > > > You're entitled to your opinion, I'm entitled to mine. We're both > entitled to > > try and convince the other that they are wrong, but in the end, if we > can't > > convince each other, the best thing to do is agree to disagree. > > > > > > > > From: William Robbins [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:02 AM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU > > > > Nice cop out. > > > > - WJR > > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:56, John Aldrich < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > I think we're going to have to agree to disagree. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:45 AM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2010 8:52 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU > > > > > Here's something I thought of... Sure you'll be able to buy an "unlock" > > > code, but will the end-user realize that they are getting the same > > physical > > > hardware as someone who pays more and know that they can unlock > > better > > > performance? Thinking about the folks who go into Best Buy or WalMart > > > to buy a new computer (this appears to be the market that this new > > "feature" > > is > > > aimed at.) My thought is that they're going to buy whatever is on the > > shelf > > > and not realize that they just need to buy an "upgrade"/unlock code to > > enable > > > better performance. > > > > > > How is that going to help the end-user? > > > > As long as Walmart doesn't say that the CPU is Quad-Core, but neglect to > tell > > you that you have to pay extra. > > > > If Walmart says that the CPU is dual core, 2GHz and supports VT, and it > costs > > $x, then why should anyone care that the CPU can do extra for additional > > payment. > > > > Cheers > > Ken > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > --- > > To manage subscriptions click here: > > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > > or send an email to [email protected] > > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > --- > > To manage subscriptions click here: > > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > > or send an email to [email protected] > > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > --- > > To manage subscriptions click here: > > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > > or send an email to [email protected] > > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > --- > > To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- > > software.com/read/my_forums/ > > or send an email to [email protected] > > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
