My "feelings" are that I'll either get another off-list email explaining how I'm wrong, or he's got his head in the sand already and won't respond.
- WJR On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:00, Miller, Michael <[email protected]>wrote: > Let’s talk about your feelings. J > > > > *From:* William Robbins [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:24 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your > CPU > > > > Whatever. You do this passive-aggressive arguing shit too often. You > start off saying you weren't clear on your original point then you proceed > to defend a point you patently have no understanding of, then as what > should become clearly your error, you either cease to reply to the email > thread, or you pull this let's agree to disagree bullshit. > > > If I could be coerced to give a damn I'd feel sorry for your pathetic, > closed-minded, delusional ass. But I can't. You're just pitiful. > > - WJR > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:19, John Aldrich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > *shrug* This discussion has gone on for awhile and neither side is going to > be able to sway the other. I see no need to drag it out and keep it going > when we're just going to disagree. I've stated my position, I've tried > various examples to explain why I think it's a bad idea, and vice versa, > but > neither side has budged their position. Why drag it out and risk getting > hateful over it? > > You're entitled to your opinion, I'm entitled to mine. We're both entitled > to try and convince the other that they are wrong, but in the end, if we > can't convince each other, the best thing to do is agree to disagree. > > > > From: William Robbins [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:02 AM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU > > > Nice cop out. > > - WJR > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:56, John Aldrich <[email protected]> > wrote: > I think we're going to have to agree to disagree. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:45 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2010 8:52 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU > > > Here's something I thought of... Sure you'll be able to buy an "unlock" > > code, but will the end-user realize that they are getting the same > physical > > hardware as someone who pays more and know that they can unlock better > > performance? Thinking about the folks who go into Best Buy or WalMart to > > buy a new computer (this appears to be the market that this new "feature" > is > > aimed at.) My thought is that they're going to buy whatever is on the > shelf > > and not realize that they just need to buy an "upgrade"/unlock code to > enable > > better performance. > > > > How is that going to help the end-user? > > As long as Walmart doesn't say that the CPU is Quad-Core, but neglect to > tell you that you have to pay extra. > > If Walmart says that the CPU is dual core, 2GHz and supports VT, and it > costs $x, then why should anyone care that the CPU can do extra for > additional payment. > > Cheers > Ken > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > ------------------------------ > This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and > thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance > with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code. > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
