The question I haven't seen answered is what phase needs to be secure? If 
you're just concerned about traffic on the wire, then Server to Server TLS 
would work fine. If you're concerned about guaranteeing that the message is 
only accessible to the recipients, then you need to look at something like 
S/MIME.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

c   - 312.731.3132

From: Tom Miller [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 11:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Seeking secure e-mail options

Good points. The message contents need to be encrypted since they will house 
patient/clinical/financial information.  Not sure about signed.  If we do TLS 
on the gateway, then server-to-server communications would be encrypted.

I can't say too much else about requirements, since there is a state committee 
looking into this and I thought I'd ask your opinions.  But we do need 
something that will be fairly easy for the sender and recipient, fairly easy to 
configure and manage.  And something that isn't "Exchange-centric", for example.

Tom

>>> "Andrew S. Baker" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 3/4/2011 
>>> 12:10 PM >>>
Please define "secure email".

Does individual messages need to be encrypted? Do messages just need to be 
signed? Does server-to-server communications need to be encrypted?

There are lots of ways to do this, and depending on your requirement, this can 
be a breeze (use TLS between servers) or ridiculously complicated (PGP between 
clients) or somewhere in between (TLS + S/MIME)




ASB (Find me online via About.Me<http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio>)
Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...


On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Tom Miller 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I'm looking for suggestions on secure e-mail. I have a Barracuda which can do 
some sort of verification, but I don't think that's what is needed. Like 
agencies in my state are looking for secure e-mail options so we can send 
clinical data to each other. I'd prefer something that is autonomous to 
whatever e-mail system is used, since other agencies may be Exchange or other 
e-mail products. We don't use Exchange here.

Suggestions appreciated.

Tom



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to