Thanks Damon,
that seems OK so far.
What boot loader are you using?
Did you also try the other ones?
I'm using BootX mainly.

Tobias

> Welcome to Linux Second-Stage Boot Loader
>
> Display base = 0x60000000
>
> Memory configuation:
> 0x00000000 - 0x02ffffff
>
> RAM disk found at 0x0050f000, size = 0x0046cea5
> Compressed kernel found at 0x0022e000, size = 0x002c3266
> Decompressing kernel....done
> Unzipped size = 0x00606ea0
> kernel at 0x0097bec0, size = 0x00616000
> Relocating RAM disk....done
> Relocated to 0x00629000 (size = 0x0046cea5)
> Source address of device tree blob: 0x0022d000
> Destination address for device tree blob: 0x00628000
> Size of device tree blob: 0x00000c69
> Copying boot infos parameters....done
> Copying device tree blob....done
> Configuring device tree ....setup_devtree: boot display node path:/ 
> whit...@0/ecs
> c...@50f20000
> done
> Final size of device tree blob: 0x00000c69
> Will enter kernel after relocating outselves to 0x01412000 (size =  
> 0x0000794c)
> Restarting at 0x0141210c
>
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Tobias Netzel
> <internet...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> Hi Damon,
>>
>> if you'd post all the messages that appear on the screen before
>> "Restarting at 0x00b2610c" I might be able to get the kernel booting
>> on your machine.
>>
>> Thanks for testing.
>> Tobias
>>
>>
>> 2010/5/10 Damon Tarry <drt1...@gmail.com>:
>>> I finally got around to testing the new kernel builds, but  
>>> without much success.
>>>
>>> The most recent kernels (from 2010) fail to start at all for me.  
>>> I get
>>> to the "Welcome to Linux Second-Stage Boot Loader", and it goes  
>>> until
>>> "Restarting at 0x00b2610c", but then hangs.
>>> Kernels from October 19-25 get past "adb: finished probe task", but
>>> then give a "hda: lost interrupt" repeating message and fail to
>>> progress further.
>> I imagine the 2300 wasn't fully supported by then.
>>> Kernel from October 14 has more success, but even fails  
>>> (attempting to
>>> kill init) because it fails to mount the ramdisk (I think).
>> The early attempts to get kernel 2.6 running had that problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nice to see that work is being done, though.
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> ----------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nubus-pmac-users mailing list
>>> Nubus-pmac-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nubus-pmac-users
>>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nubus-pmac-users mailing list
>> Nubus-pmac-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nubus-pmac-users
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> --------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nubus-pmac-users mailing list
> Nubus-pmac-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nubus-pmac-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Nubus-pmac-users mailing list
Nubus-pmac-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nubus-pmac-users

Reply via email to