wow, sounds like me sermon too, especially the bus part


On 10/4/12 10:54 AM, Howard Jones wrote:
Ha!
I always teach people that they have the right to be run over by a bus, and the rest of the team pick up where they left off without constantly ringing the hospital!

Howard

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* Frank Rueter <[email protected]>
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Sent:* Wednesday, 3 October 2012, 22:35
    *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] Re: new comp stack node survey

    Whoever produced this node graph needs a good telling off.
    I've always been of the opinion that, unless you're a
    one-man-band, the script is as important as the final pixels
    you're delivering (if not more so), and working within a team, a
    compositor should be responsible and take care that anybody can
    open, tweak and render their scripts without too much pain.

    I have seen far worse than the attached image though :-D


    Makes you want to write a callback that refuses to render if their
    are too many pipes that aren't horizontal or vertical ;)




    On 10/4/12 10:13 AM, helmsie wrote:
    Thanks Howard. I stand corrected.

    Having the ability to quickly walk through and reorder a stack
    can add speed and organization to the workflow. I'm constantly
    seeing Nuke node graphs like the attached that could be
    significantly simplified with a stack node as a precomp. A pick
    your poison. So far, looks like most folks agree with you.

    Helmsie

    [quote="mrhowardjones"]It was the multiLayer node - see attached.

    I remember it became an issue on the list at the time as it was
    thought of as a bad idea, and the consensus was if you used it
    with one operation only then
    it was useful. So we ran it as a multiScreen, multiOver etc...



    Howard

    [quote]


    _______________________________________________
    Nuke-users mailing list
    [email protected]  
<mailto:[email protected]>,http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
    http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users



    _______________________________________________
    Nuke-users mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>,
    http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
    http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users



_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to