I'd like multi outputs from a gizmo but what you describe with internal
workings seems to be a gizmo rather than a 'black box ' multilayer node, which
deals with the internals in a hidden manner.
Somewhat digressing though from Helmsie's poll though.
Howard
>________________________________
> From: Steve K <[email protected]>
>To: Nuke user discussion <[email protected]>
>Cc: "[email protected]"
><[email protected]>
>Sent: Wednesday, 3 October 2012, 23:32
>Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] new comp stack node survey
>
>A little competition is a good thing :)
>
>
>How so?
>After some thought, I guess it would/could be an issue for a multichannel
>workflow...but wouldn't the existing gizmo workflow have the same issues?
>
>Frank, Could you elaborate?
>
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
>On 2012-10-03, at 6:24 PM, Frank Rueter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> wouldn't that compete with the multi channel philosophy?
>>
>> On 10/4/12 10:56 AM, Steve K wrote:
>>> Hey Helmsie,
>>> What about multi-output gizmo functionality like in Katana. I haven't used
>>> katana in a couple years, but I long for the ability to be able to have
>>> multiple outputs in Nuke...
>>> Where one could build a multi purpose node like you mentioned....AND have
>>> the ability to edit the inner node graph.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On 2012-10-03, at 3:06 PM, "helmsie" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello all!
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to see the interest in the Nuke community for a comp stack node.
>>>> It would take multiple inputs that can be reordered, soloed, muted, and
>>>> the comp operation switched on the fly without disconnecting/reordering
>>>> nodes in the node graph. Think photoshop layers. The interface would be
>>>> similar to the current roto node layers. See the mockup attached. Please
>>>> respond to this post so there is a count for yea/nay.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>> Helmsie
>>>> <NukeCompNodeMockup_3_2010.jpg>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>_______________________________________________
>Nuke-users mailing list
>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
