Though reading Frank's reply - multichannels is the Nuke way
Howard
>________________________________
> From: Howard Jones <[email protected]>
>To: Nuke user discussion <[email protected]>
>Sent: Wednesday, 3 October 2012, 23:37
>Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] new comp stack node survey
>
>
>I'd like multi outputs from a gizmo but what you describe with internal
>workings seems to be a gizmo rather than a 'black box ' multilayer node, which
>deals with the internals in a hidden manner.
>
>Somewhat digressing though from Helmsie's poll though.
>
>
>
>
>Howard
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Steve K <[email protected]>
>>To: Nuke user discussion <[email protected]>
>>Cc: "[email protected]"
>><[email protected]>
>>Sent: Wednesday, 3 October 2012, 23:32
>>Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] new comp stack node survey
>>
>>A little competition is a good thing :)
>>
>>
>>How so?
>>After some thought, I guess it would/could be an issue for a multichannel
>>workflow...but wouldn't the existing gizmo workflow have the same issues?
>>
>>Frank, Could you elaborate?
>>
>>
>>Sent from my iPad
>>
>>On 2012-10-03, at 6:24 PM, Frank Rueter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> wouldn't that compete with the multi channel philosophy?
>>>
>>> On 10/4/12 10:56 AM, Steve K wrote:
>>>> Hey Helmsie,
>>>> What about multi-output gizmo functionality like in Katana. I haven't
>>>> used katana in a couple years, but I long for the ability to be able to
>>>> have multiple outputs in Nuke...
>>>> Where one could build a multi purpose node like you mentioned....AND have
>>>> the ability to edit the inner node graph.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>> On 2012-10-03, at 3:06 PM, "helmsie" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello all!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to see the interest in the Nuke community for a comp stack node.
>>>>> It would take multiple inputs that can be reordered, soloed, muted, and
>>>>> the comp operation switched on the fly without disconnecting/reordering
nodes in the node graph. Think photoshop layers. The interface would be
similar to the current roto node layers. See the mockup attached. Please
respond to this post so there is a count for yea/nay.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>> Helmsie
>>>>> <NukeCompNodeMockup_3_2010.jpg>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing
list
>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>_______________________________________________
>>Nuke-users mailing list
>>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Nuke-users mailing list
>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
