I mean you missed off one label (TMI) Howard
On 11 Apr 2013, at 08:31, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > I quite like 3 (you missed off one slider). I always use it landscape as my > screen is wider and if I stretch it full width I get a great granularity. > > However in 3 you still use up UI because the bars are not hiding but > collapsing the sliders. Plus it doesn't take long to know just by looking > that a set of sliders are RGB or HSV > > From a UI design IMHO by adding a divider between the colour wheel and the > sliders you are breaking the connection between the colour wheel and the > sliders. Though subtle isn't an improvement to me. > > Howard > > On 11 Apr 2013, at 04:56, Martin Constabe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Whoops. Pallete_03.png should have looked like this… >> >> >> <pallete_03.png> >> >> >> On Apr 11, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Martin Constabe wrote: >> >>> I am now in front of my Nuke and playing with the color picker. I think >>> that a lot of the issues that I raised could be dealt with by slightly >>> expanded minimum spacing values. I often see student staring at the pallet >>> in the attached configuration (pallet_01.png). The bars are far too close >>> for comfort. In pallet_02.png all I have done is to expand the pallet a bit >>> and, in photoshop, shrink the color wheel a bit. This I feel is easier to >>> read. >>> >>> I can not find the student's work on this topic. But one thing that I >>> recall as being a sensible idea was to reconfigure the color space buttons >>> in the manner show in pallet_03.png. This is observant of the simple >>> principle: that buttons and their associated actions should be visually >>> related. I also moved the before / after sample swatch to a more agreeable >>> position and sightly increased the spacing on the top bar to accommodate a >>> larger swatch. This is to reflect its importance. I also added a divider >>> line between the wheel and the rest of the pallet. >>> >>> These are not behavior changes so much as readability changes. >>> >>> Personally I am a big fan of MODOS's interface. They have done an excellent >>> job of maintaining consistency and usability. However, I am a bigger fan of >>> Nuke's nimbleness (MODO can be a tad sticky sometimes). >>> >>> >>> <pallete_03.png> >>> >>> >>> <pallet_01.png><Pallet_02.png> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 10, 2013, at 9:45 PM, Howard Jones wrote: >>> >>>> Glad you said that. I find it really good so I'd be interested in what the >>>> too many cooks bit is. >>>> Only thing I'd like is save able pallettes and then only once in a blue >>>> moon. >>>> >>>> But if there's something better I'm all ears. (We are talking about the >>>> colour wheel slider thingy aren't we?) >>>> >>>> Howard >>>> >>>> On 10 Apr 2013, at 14:37, "Diogo Girondi" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I too would love to see what would you consider the ideal color picker >>>>> palette. >>>>> >>>>> Last time it changed it was for the worse and they end up rolling it back >>>>> to its original design. I remember giving a few stabs my self at that >>>>> time and all I could do was to make it a bit fancier/prettier. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Ean Carr <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey Martin, how would you prefer it then? IMO, the color picker hasn't >>>>> changed much over the years because it functions like the majority of >>>>> users want it to, me included. But I'm all ears if you can dream up >>>>> something better :) -Ean >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Martin Constabe <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> When I teach interface design I show them Nuke's color picker pallet as >>>>> an example of 'too many cooks spoil the broth'. >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Rich T wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > [quote="Elias"]Just resize the window and you'll get the other layout >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks Elias, that was easy >>>>> > >>>>> > Rich >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Richard Turner >>>>> > Digital Media >>>>> > Central Institute of Technology >>>>> > Perth. WA >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > Nuke-users mailing list >>>>> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
