Thanks!

Martin

On Apr 12, 2013, at 2:59 AM, Marten Blumen wrote:

> just add to ~/.nuke/uistate.ini
> 
> [ColorPicker]
> ShownColorSpaces\RGB=true
> ShownColorSpaces\HSV=true
> ShownColorSpaces\TMI=true
> ShownColorSpaces\Wheel=true
> ShownColorSpaces\Swatches=true
> Dynamic=false
> 
> 
> 
> On 12 April 2013 02:12, Martin Constabe <[email protected]> wrote:
> A bug? I thought it was a feature!
> 
> Actually, what I was referring to was the behavior that it defaults to in a 
> fresh-out-the-box situation. i.e. the very first time that a user opens Nuke. 
> IMHO the pristine install opening state is a crucial part of the user 
> experience in any software.
> 
> Martin
> 
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 10:02 PM, Ean Carr wrote:
> 
> > Regarding default opening behaviour: Nuke should remember which sliders you 
> > had shown in $HOME/.nuke/uistate.ini. If it's not working for you, then 
> > that's a bug. I do remember having problems with this in the past but it 
> > appears to be working fine in 7.0v5. -E
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Martin Constabe <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > Howard: I agree with your enthusiasm on the ability to make very long 
> > sliders. Is great.
> >
> > I am also hooked on the ability to make a color balance correction using T 
> > then being able to refine it with an R or a B. Is great and I miss that in 
> > every other app I have.
> >
> > Fair enough on the points about screen real estate.
> >
> > However, I stand by my point about the need for a little more minimum space 
> > between the sliders. I think Ean's mock up is a good solution.
> >
> > One more point… a small but significant one. After a new install, the 
> > default opening behavior in the Windows (and maybe Mac) Nuke color picker 
> > pallet is (I recall) for all the sliders to be open at once. I think that 
> > by changing this to only the HSV sliders being open will be a significant 
> > improvement. Newbies will be less confused and battle weary pros will not 
> > care one way or another.
> >
> > I know that Nuke is not, and will never be a app for greenhorns. However, 
> > as long as it is taught in schools such as mine, easing newbies into a 
> > painless user experience will always be an issue.
> >
> >
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On Apr 11, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Howard Jones wrote:
> >
> > > I quite like 3 (you missed off one slider). I always use it landscape as 
> > > my screen is wider and if I stretch it full width I get a great 
> > > granularity.
> > >
> > > However in 3 you still use up UI because the bars are not hiding but 
> > > collapsing the sliders. Plus it doesn't take long to know just by looking 
> > > that a set of sliders are RGB or HSV
> > >
> > > From a UI design IMHO by adding a divider between the colour wheel and 
> > > the sliders you are breaking the connection between the colour wheel and 
> > > the sliders. Though subtle isn't an improvement to me.
> > >
> > > Howard
> > >
> > > On 11 Apr 2013, at 04:56, Martin Constabe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Whoops. Pallete_03.png should have looked like this…
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> <pallete_03.png>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Apr 11, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Martin Constabe wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I am now in front of my Nuke and playing with the color picker. I think 
> > >>> that a lot of the issues that I raised could be dealt with by slightly 
> > >>> expanded minimum spacing values. I often see student staring at the 
> > >>> pallet in the attached configuration (pallet_01.png). The bars are far 
> > >>> too close for comfort. In pallet_02.png all I have done is to expand 
> > >>> the pallet a bit and, in photoshop, shrink the color wheel a bit. This 
> > >>> I feel is easier to read.
> > >>>
> > >>> I can not find the student's work on this topic. But one thing that I 
> > >>> recall as being a sensible idea was to reconfigure the color space 
> > >>> buttons in the manner show in pallet_03.png. This is observant of the 
> > >>> simple principle: that buttons and their associated actions should be 
> > >>> visually related. I also moved the before / after sample swatch to a 
> > >>> more agreeable position and sightly increased the spacing on the top 
> > >>> bar to accommodate a larger swatch. This is to reflect its importance. 
> > >>> I also added a divider line between the wheel and the rest of the 
> > >>> pallet.
> > >>>
> > >>> These are not behavior changes so much as readability changes.
> > >>>
> > >>> Personally I am a big fan of MODOS's interface. They have done an 
> > >>> excellent job of maintaining consistency and usability. However, I am a 
> > >>> bigger fan of Nuke's nimbleness (MODO can be a tad sticky sometimes).
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> <pallete_03.png>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> <pallet_01.png><Pallet_02.png>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Apr 10, 2013, at 9:45 PM, Howard Jones wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Glad you said that. I find it really good so I'd be interested in what 
> > >>>> the too many cooks bit is.
> > >>>> Only thing I'd like is save able pallettes and then only once in a 
> > >>>> blue moon.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But if there's something better I'm all ears. (We are talking about 
> > >>>> the colour wheel slider thingy aren't we?)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Howard
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 10 Apr 2013, at 14:37, "Diogo Girondi" <[email protected]> 
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I too would love to see what would you consider the ideal color 
> > >>>>> picker palette.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Last time it changed it was for the worse and they end up rolling it 
> > >>>>> back to its original design. I remember giving a few stabs my self at 
> > >>>>> that time and all I could do was to make it a bit fancier/prettier.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Ean Carr <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hey Martin, how would you prefer it then? IMO, the color picker 
> > >>>>> hasn't changed much over the years because it functions like the 
> > >>>>> majority of users want it to, me included. But I'm all ears if you 
> > >>>>> can dream up something better :) -Ean
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Martin Constabe 
> > >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>> When I teach interface design I show them Nuke's color picker pallet 
> > >>>>> as an example of 'too many cooks spoil the broth'.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Rich T wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > [quote="Elias"]Just resize the window and you'll get the other 
> > >>>>> > layout
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Thanks Elias, that was easy
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Rich
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Richard Turner
> > >>>>> > Digital Media
> > >>>>> > Central Institute of Technology
> > >>>>> > Perth. WA
> > >>>>> > _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> > Nuke-users mailing list
> > >>>>> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> > >>>>> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
> > >>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> > >>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
> > >>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> > >>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> Nuke-users mailing list
> > >>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> > >>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Nuke-users mailing list
> > >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> > >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Nuke-users mailing list
> > >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> > >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Nuke-users mailing list
> > > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> > > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nuke-users mailing list
> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nuke-users mailing list
> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to