I heard a couple of stories as well.
I'm sure there are freelancers out there using Nuke is a less than paid for
manner. And that's not right.
But it would seem to me that on one side, a freelancer simply can't afford
to pay $9,000 for software, and on the other side, the more people use
Nuke, the more it becomes popular and turns into bought licenses by post
houses that can.
Anyway, it just feels to me that, as was discussed in a previous thread,
Nuke is getting too expensive in this day and age. Especially for
freelancers. With Fusion being free, and AE costing peanuts, it's hard to
justify the huge expense, even with Nuke being a much better software.

Ta




Ron Ganbar
email: [email protected]
tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
     +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Arvid Björn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Mr. Mail Bag has a good point though. I've heard a lot of horror stories
> on this subject by now. TF is really pushing it to the point of scaring
> away legitimate customers.
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Francois Lord <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the info, Info Mail Bag!
>>
>>
>> On 15-Dec-14 22:46, Info Mail Bag wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Over the past few weeks I have had a steadily escalating level of email
>>> harassment from the license department of the foundry.
>>>
>>> To be clear I personally have not used "cracked" versions of the
>>> software.
>>>
>>> I have maintained contact though out,  explaining this to them the best
>>> I can but the ultimate result is, the threat to contact / investigate
>>> current and past employers and that if I dont change my story and admit to
>>> some thing I have not done and take a settlement legal action will be taken.
>>>
>>> As much as I love the Nuke line and now nukeStudio is part of the mix it
>>> makes it very hard but being a single operator I will be moving on and
>>> taking the road of Fusion.
>>>
>>> thank you_______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to