Haha, good idea. Though I wonder if Nuke will identify those as "out of date" as well. There really should be a "force cache" option to bypass Nuke's "cleverness" in identifying the cache files' validity.

On 10/24/2015 09:34 PM, Matt Plec wrote:
2000 symlinks? It hurts to suggest it almost as much as it will to do it, but ought to work...



On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Frank Rueter|OHUfx <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I did, but I'm using Vray and that seems to get confused when
    there is a FrameHold after the ParticleCache node


    On 10/23/2015 07:28 PM, Marten Blumen wrote:
    Try using a Frame Hold

    On 23 October 2015 at 18:10, Frank Rueter|OHUfx <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        HI all,

        has anybody had any luck with using the particle cache for a
        single frame?
        I have about 2000 frames and need static particles, so I
        generated a single particle cache file (from a static system)
        but Nuke insists on it being out of date as soon as I change
        frames.
        I don't feel like generating 2000 identical cache files.

        Any ideas?

        Cheers,
        frank


-- ohufxLogo 50x50 <http://www.ohufx.com> *vfx compositing
        <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-compositing> | *workflow
        customisation and consulting
        <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-customising>* *


        _______________________________________________
        Nuke-users mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>,
        http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
        http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users




    _______________________________________________
    Nuke-users mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>,http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
    http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users


    _______________________________________________
    Nuke-users mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>,
    http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
    http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users




_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to