On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:12:07 -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote:
[clip]
Here is a related ticket that proposes a more explicit alternative:
adding a ``dot`` method to ndarray.
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1456
I kind of like this idea. Simple, obvious, and leads
to clear code:
a.dot(b).dot(c)
or in another multiplication order,
a.dot(b.dot(c))
And here's an implementation:
http://github.com/pv/numpy-work/commit/414429ce0bb0c4b7e780c4078c5ff71c113050b6
I think I'm going to apply this, unless someone complains, as I
don't see any downsides (except maybe adding one more to the
huge list of methods ndarray already has).
+1
-Travis
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
