On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Pauli Virtanen <[email protected]> wrote: > Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:12:07 -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote: > [clip] > > Here is a related ticket that proposes a more explicit alternative: > > adding a ``dot`` method to ndarray. > > http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1456 > > I kind of like this idea. Simple, obvious, and leads > to clear code: > > a.dot(b).dot(c) > > or in another multiplication order, > > a.dot(b.dot(c)) > > And here's an implementation: > > > http://github.com/pv/numpy-work/commit/414429ce0bb0c4b7e780c4078c5ff71c113050b6 > > I think I'm going to apply this, unless someone complains, as I > don't see any downsides (except maybe adding one more to the > huge list of methods ndarray already has). > > That should do it. I was going to link directly to the code in multiarraymodule, maybe break it out into a separate dot.c file, but the call to the python function gets to the goal with less effort.
Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
