On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Pauli Virtanen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:12:07 -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote: > [clip] > > Here is a related ticket that proposes a more explicit alternative: > > adding a ``dot`` method to ndarray. > > http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1456 > > I kind of like this idea. Simple, obvious, and leads > to clear code: > > a.dot(b).dot(c) > > or in another multiplication order, > > a.dot(b.dot(c)) > > And here's an implementation: > > > http://github.com/pv/numpy-work/commit/414429ce0bb0c4b7e780c4078c5ff71c113050b6 > > I think I'm going to apply this, unless someone complains, I have a big one: NO DOCSTRING!!! We're just perpetuating the errors of the past people! Very discouraging! DG > as I > don't see any downsides (except maybe adding one more to the > huge list of methods ndarray already has). > > Cheers, > Pauli > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > -- Mathematician: noun, someone who disavows certainty when their uncertainty set is non-empty, even if that set has measure zero.
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
