On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Bruce Southey <bsout...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote:
> > Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:58:11 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >> For numpy 1.5.0 no one has yet said they have urgent changes that need
> >> to go in. If you do, please reply with the what and why. If nothing big
> >> has to go in, I propose the following release schedule:
> >>
> >> Aug 1 : beta 1
> >> Aug 15: rc 1
> >> Aug 22: rc 2
> >> Aug 29: release
> >
> > Seems OK. I don't remember any big changes that would still be needed.
> >
> > One low-hanging fruit to fix could be np.fromfile raising MemoryError
> > when it encounters EOF, and other bugs in that part of the code.
> >
> > --
> > Pauli Virtanen
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
>
> Can ticket 1079 (add option for header to savetxt) be added?
> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1079
>
> Sure. It has a patch, so I'll add it to the list. Note that it doesn't mean
the patch goes in for sure, my list is mainly to remember to bug the right
committer about it. In this case I suppose that's Pierre.


> Not that it affects me, but, since you included an intel compiler
> ticket, is ticket 960 (Intel64 --compiler=intelem fails to set correct
> compiler options) still relevant?
> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/960
>
> I suppose it is. I'm trying to look at all distutils patches, but it's
usually hard to (a) understand and (b) test it, since most patches are for
platforms/compilers I don't have access to.

Cheers,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to