On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:20 PM, David Cournapeau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Just submitted this pull request for discussion: >> > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/297 >> > >> > As per earlier discussion on the list, this PR attempts to remove >> > exactly and only the maskna-related code from numpy mainline: >> > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-May/062417.html >> > >> > The suggestion is that we merge this to master for the 1.7 release, >> > and immediately "git revert" it on a branch so that it can be modified >> > further without blocking the release. >> > >> > The first patch does the actual maskna removal; the second and third >> > rearrange things so that PyArray_ReduceWrapper does not end up in the >> > public API, for reasons described therein. >> > >> > All tests pass with Python 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 3.1, 3.2 on 64-bit >> > Ubuntu. The docs also appear to build. Before I re-based this I also >> > tested against Scipy, matplotlib, and pandas, and all were fine. >> >> While it's tempting to think that the lack of response to this >> email/PR indicates that everyone now agrees with me about how to >> proceed with the NA work, I'm for some reason unconvinced... >> >> Any objections to merging this? > > > No objection, but could you wait for this WE ? I am in the middle of setting > up a buildbot for windows for numpy (for both mingw and MSVC compilers), and > that would be a good way to test it.
Sounds like we have consensus and the patch is good to go, so let me know when you're ready... _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
