On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > After 88 emails we don't have a conclusion in the other thread (see > [1] for background). But we have to come to some conclusion or another > if we want @ to exist :-). So I'll summarize where the discussion > stands and let's see if we can find some way to resolve this.
"The numpy community has no consensus strongly preferring one option over another" is a perfectly fine conclusion to this thread on numpy-discussion, IMO. Actually deciding what goes into the PEP given that input and merged with other concerns should probably happen on python-ideas. -- Robert Kern _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
