On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> After 88 emails we don't have a conclusion in the other thread (see >> [1] for background). But we have to come to some conclusion or another >> if we want @ to exist :-). So I'll summarize where the discussion >> stands and let's see if we can find some way to resolve this. > > "The numpy community has no consensus strongly preferring one option > over another" is a perfectly fine conclusion to this thread on > numpy-discussion, IMO. Actually deciding what goes into the PEP given > that input and merged with other concerns should probably happen on > python-ideas.
Yep, if we converge on deadlock then that's what we'll do, but I'm not yet convinced that we've converged at all. In the last few hours the "vote" deltas are right -1, left +3... -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh http://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
