On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> After 88 emails we don't have a conclusion in the other thread (see > >> [1] for background). But we have to come to some conclusion or another > >> if we want @ to exist :-). So I'll summarize where the discussion > >> stands and let's see if we can find some way to resolve this. > > > > "The numpy community has no consensus strongly preferring one option > > over another" is a perfectly fine conclusion to this thread on > > numpy-discussion, IMO. Actually deciding what goes into the PEP given > > that input and merged with other concerns should probably happen on > > python-ideas. > > Yep, if we converge on deadlock then that's what we'll do, but I'm not > yet convinced that we've converged at all. In the last few hours the > "vote" deltas are right -1, left +3... > If it helps, my +1 is also for left associative. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
