On Sa, 2014-07-26 at 15:38 +0200, Eelco Hoogendoorn wrote: > I was wondering the same thing. Are there any known tradeoffs to this > method of reduction? >
Yes, it is much more complicated and incompatible with naive ufuncs if you want your memory access to be optimized. And optimizing that is very much worth it speed wise... - Sebastian > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Sturla Molden > <sturla.mol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > > > chose more stable algorithms for such statistical functions. > The > > pairwise summation that is in master now is very awesome, > but it is not > > secure enough in the sense that a new user will have > difficulty > > understanding when he can be sure it is used. > > > Why is it not always used? > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
