Sturla Molden <sturla.mol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > >> Yes, it is much more complicated and incompatible with naive ufuncs if >> you want your memory access to be optimized. And optimizing that is very >> much worth it speed wise... > > Why? Couldn't we just copy the data chunk-wise to a temporary buffer of say > 2**13 numbers and then reduce that? I don't see why we need another > iterator for that.
I am sorry if this is a stupid suggestion. My knowledge of how NumPy ufuncs works could have been better. Sturla _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
