Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > Yes, it is much more complicated and incompatible with naive ufuncs if > you want your memory access to be optimized. And optimizing that is very > much worth it speed wise...
Why? Couldn't we just copy the data chunk-wise to a temporary buffer of say 2**13 numbers and then reduce that? I don't see why we need another iterator for that. Sturla _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
