(This is not relevant to the main topic of the thread, but FYI I think the recarray issues are fixed in 1.10.4.) On Feb 7, 2016 11:10 PM, "Nadav Horesh" <nad...@visionsense.com> wrote:
> I have atlas-lapack-base installed via pacman (required by sagemath). > Since the numpy installation insisted on openblas on /usr/local, I got the > openblas source-code and installed it on /usr/local. > BTW, I use 1.11b rather then 1.10.x since the 1.10 is very slow in > handling recarrays. For the tests I am erasing the 1.11 installation, and > installing the 1.10.4 wheel. I do verify that I have the right version > before running the tests, but I am not sure if there no unnoticed side > effects. > > Would it help if I put a side the openblas installation and rerun the test? > > Nadav > ________________________________________ > From: NumPy-Discussion <numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org> on behalf of > Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > Sent: 08 February 2016 08:13 > To: Discussion of Numerical Python > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please > test > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Nadav Horesh <nad...@visionsense.com> > wrote: > > Thank you fo reminding me, it is OK now: > > $ python -c 'import numpy; print(numpy.__config__.show())' > > > > lapack_opt_info: > > library_dirs = ['/usr/local/lib'] > > language = c > > libraries = ['openblas'] > > define_macros = [('HAVE_CBLAS', None)] > > blas_mkl_info: > > NOT AVAILABLE > > openblas_info: > > library_dirs = ['/usr/local/lib'] > > language = c > > libraries = ['openblas'] > > define_macros = [('HAVE_CBLAS', None)] > > openblas_lapack_info: > > library_dirs = ['/usr/local/lib'] > > language = c > > libraries = ['openblas'] > > define_macros = [('HAVE_CBLAS', None)] > > blas_opt_info: > > library_dirs = ['/usr/local/lib'] > > language = c > > libraries = ['openblas'] > > define_macros = [('HAVE_CBLAS', None)] > > None > > > > I updated openblas to the latest version (0.2.15) and it pass the tests > > Oh dear - now I'm confused. So you installed the wheel, and tested > it, and it gave a test failure. Then you updated openblas using > pacman, and then reran the tests against the wheel numpy, and they > passed? That's a bit frightening - the wheel should only see its own > copy of openblas... > > Thans for persisting, > > Matthew > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion