Hi Nadav, On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > (This is not relevant to the main topic of the thread, but FYI I think the > recarray issues are fixed in 1.10.4.) > > On Feb 7, 2016 11:10 PM, "Nadav Horesh" <nad...@visionsense.com> wrote: >> >> I have atlas-lapack-base installed via pacman (required by sagemath). >> Since the numpy installation insisted on openblas on /usr/local, I got the >> openblas source-code and installed it on /usr/local. >> BTW, I use 1.11b rather then 1.10.x since the 1.10 is very slow in >> handling recarrays. For the tests I am erasing the 1.11 installation, and >> installing the 1.10.4 wheel. I do verify that I have the right version >> before running the tests, but I am not sure if there no unnoticed side >> effects. >> >> Would it help if I put a side the openblas installation and rerun the >> test?
Would you mind doing something like this, and posting the output?: virtualenv test-manylinux source test-manylinux/bin/activate pip install -f https://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/manylinux numpy==1.10.4 nose python -c 'import numpy; numpy.test()' python -c 'import numpy; print(numpy.__config__.show())' deactivate virtualenv test-from-source source test-from-source/bin/activate pip install numpy==1.10.4 nose python -c 'import numpy; numpy.test()' python -c 'import numpy; print(numpy.__config__.show())' deactivate I'm puzzled that the wheel gives a test error when the source install does not, and my best guess was an openblas problem, but this just to make sure we have the output from the exact same numpy version, at least. Thanks again, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
