Hi, On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36 >> hours: >> >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779#issue-213781439 >> >> This has happened before: >> >> https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org/issues/187#issue-186426408 >> >> I think it was down for about 24 hours that time. >> >> From the number of people opening issues or commenting on the >> scipy.org website this time, it seems to be causing quite a bit of >> disruption. >> >> It seems to me that we would have a much better chances of avoiding >> significant down-time, if we switched to hosting the docs on github >> pages. >> >> What do y'all think? > > > Once the site is back up we should look at migrating to a better (hosted) > infrastructure. I suspect that Github Pages won't work, we'll exceed or be > close to exceeding both the 1 GB site size limit and the 100 GB/month > bandwidth limit [1]. > > Rough bandwidth estimate (using page size from > http://scipy.github.io/devdocs/ and Alexa stats): 2 million visits per > month, 2.5 page views per visit, 5 kb/page = 25 GB/month (html). Add to that > pdf docs, which are ~20 MB in size: if only a small fraction of visitors > download those, we'll be at >100 GB.
Maybe we could host the PDF docs somewhere else? I wonder if Github would consider allowing us to go a bit over if necessary? Cheers, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion