Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:15:08 +0100, Didrik Pinte kirjoitti: >> The advantage of something like github pages is that it's big enough >> that it *does* have dedicated ops support. > > Agreed. One issue is that we are working with a lot of legacy. Github > will more than likely be a great solution to host static web pages but > the evaluation for the shift needs to get into all the funky legacy > redirects/rewrites we have in place, etc. This is probably not a real > issue for docs.scipy.org but would be for other services.
IIRC, there's not that many of them, so in principle it could be possible to cobble them with <meta> redirects. >> As long as we can fit under the 1 gig size limit then GH pages seems >> like the best option so far... it's reliable, widely understood, and >> all of the limits besides the 1 gig size are soft limits where they say >> they'll work with us to figure things out. > > Another option would be to just host the content under S3 with > Cloudfront. > It will also be pretty simple as a setup, scale nicely and won't have > much restrictions on sizing. Some minor-ish disadvantages of this are that it brings a new set of credentials to manage, it will be somewhat less transparent, and the tooling will be less familiar to people (eg release managers) who have to deal with it. _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion