Maybe two lists would be doable if good-old-fashioned netiquette is
mandatory. Then you would only need to read the last email in a threat to
follow what has been written, etc. But...
Not sure that's necessary. nupic-hackers is where the low-level discussions
about the code goes; nupic-discuss is a healthy mixture of Jeff's goals -
to discover the principles of operation of the brain, and to develop
systems based on those. This is a key value of the work: if you can't build
it, you don't yet have the theory working. nupic-discuss is a place where
There are many who can contribute to building but who will never build.
For instance, Jeffs' idea that unexpected things will be attended to; a
psychologist with knowledge about autism might have a lot to say about
this; autistic people do not like unpredictable situations. I would like
to see a list where such people would like to join.
we can all learn about the theory (both realised and to-be-realised), and
also figure out how to build the software to demonstrate it. Subject lines
(when done well) are great ways to filter the various aspects for those
interested more in theory than practise (or vice versa).
I'd like that. Especially that you want to search for some
theory-discussions long time ago and it's little inconvenient in the volume
of nupic general ML.
If I created a nupic-theory mailing list, which strictly contained
discussion only about the theory and principles behind CLA & HTM,
would you sign up for it? Or do you think two MLs is enough for now?
--
Bert
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
