2008/7/11 Charles Lepple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Arnaud Quette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/7/11 Nicholas Kain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> A unified driver (or at least one with common code) would certainly
>>> be a worthy goal.
>>
>> I very much encourage you to do so.
>> it has already been done for many nut drivers, and is part of the goal
>> to improve maintainability / footprint by reducing the code size.
>> There are various approaches, but Charles should already know these...
>
> You mean the same serial/USB architecture as in megatec and megatec_usb?

or the kind as in newmge-shut / usbhid-ups, depending on the interface
/ merge level...

>> Nicholas and Charles: do you think you would be in time for 2.4
>> (around september)?
>
> Possibly, although that would probably cut into documentation time.

argh, you're hard ;-)
the doc has a higher prio than QA, but I'm slowly starting to give it a shape.
ok, you can probably start with the protocol section so. let's
followup separately...

-- Arnaud

_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev

Reply via email to