On Fri, 25 Dec 2009, Arjen de Korte wrote:
> Well, the only thing we could do, is fallback to these defaults if
> the   detection via 'libusb-config' fails to detect the libusb
> presence. But I really feel that this is a regression in FreeBSD and
> that not including libusb-config is really hurting. I fail to
> understand why the FreeBSD maintainers choose this is easier to fix
> in all packages that use libusb, than to just include a
> 'libusb-config' that simply returns these values.

It could probably be added, it does seem a bit silly that the library is 
there but the standard way of detecting it isn't..

I sent a message to freebsd-usb@ about it, I'll let you know what 
arises.

If you put the attached script in /usr/bin and chmod 555 it, it should 
work.

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

Attachment: libusb-config
Description: application/shellscript

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev

Reply via email to