On Friday 10 January 2020 07:28:13 Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jan 9, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Thursday 09 January 2020 16:59:12 Charles Lepple wrote: > >> On Jan 9, 2020, at 4:39 PM, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> So for starters, what's the best ./configure command line? > >> > >> There’s this page for matching the layout of an existing Debian > >> install: > >> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/wiki/Building-NUT-on-Debian, > >>-Ra spbian-and-Ubuntu > >> > >> But remind me, what are you hoping to get from the later version of > >> NUT? (We don’t have code for Modbus yet, per my other email about > >> the two varieties of Smart-UPS 1500.) > > > > Experience building it? Since it won't actually be doing any > > shutdown type control, I figure once built and installed, I can copy > > this machines /etc/ups contents over what is going to be installed > > and be not more than one edit away from running a "upsc myups" and > > getting a report from it. Or am I dreaming? > > I can't argue with getting experience building it, but as the wiki > page hints, there are still some distribution-specific things that the > generic NUT build can't handle, like installing the correct systemd > startup scripts. Usually that build procedure is a stop-gap for > upgrading just one driver, by installing over a Debian package. > > > I do note that this ups has 3 rj45's on the end of it, but all my > > ethernet in that box is committed. I'd assume 2 of them are for > > surge absorption loop-thru's, but none of the 3 are actually > > labeled, so I've no clue which is which w/o reading what little docs > > came with it. Shrug. :) > > (cue obligatory rant about vendors misusing standard connectors in > proprietary ways, though you are right that two of them are for > surges)
I found some markings, one marked IN, the other 2 OUT. > > Down to the mega-command, I left out the ssl and NSS, had to install > > libusb-dev but I see its not going to make docs. That needs fixed as > > most of that stuff is already installed. But adding --with-doc opens > > another can of worms: > > > > A "make" says it needs aclocal, which is part of automake, but its > > newer than what it wants, which is aclocal-1.14, but I have > > automake 1:1.16.1-4. > > > > Suggested fix? > > Not sure where that message is coming from, but glad it worked with > the newer aclocal. (Did you use the release tarball, or a Git > checkout?) Release 2.7.4 tarball. Docs are years out of date, man pages claim 2.7.3 dated in 2015... But it works, and thats what counts. :) Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. - Louis D. Brandeis Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
