[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, Kjell, > > Kjell Claesson wrote: > > Can you upgrade to 2.0.5, or any better if you can use the svn trunk. > > Thanks very much for your pointer. I'm currently trying to compile but > it appears to be broken on my Debian (stable) system. > > The issue here is that the configure script appears to assume that both > libgd and libXpm will be in the same place, but here libgd is indeed in > /usr/lib, but libXpm is in /usr/X11R6/lib. I know how to fix that in a > plain makefile (adding -L/usr/X11R6/lib just before -lXpm) but I'm not > very good on autoconf stuff.
Dear Steve, "./configure --help" is all you need to know, because this shows: --with-gd-libs=FLAGS linker flags for the gd library So you can put whatever linker flags you need in there. However, I agree that it would be better if autoconf handled this automatically in all known cases. The corresponding test is in m4/nut_check_libgd.m4. On my system, gdlib-config is not installed, and therefore, NUT uses the default flags, which are LDFLAGS="-L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgd -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lfreetype -lm -lXpm -lX11" and should work for you. Probably the problem is that gdlib-config outputs something wrong or incomplete on your system. Maybe we need a separate test for libXpm. What is the output of the following on your system? gdlib-config --version gdlib-config --ldflags gdlib-config --includes Does this include flags for libXpm, or is there a similar but separate mechanism for determining libXpm flags? Thanks, -- Peter _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
