Arjen de Korte wrote: > Citeren Thomas Gutzler <[email protected]>: > >> In summary: >> - no EMI (port re-connect) for the 'old' ups >> - 68 and 76 USBDEVFS_CONTROL errors for the 'old' ups over the first and >> second period >> - 323 and 314 USBDEVFS_CONTROL errors for the 'new' ups over the first >> and second period > > The 'old' UPS might not be using interrupt reports and therefor, we > don't see collisions. Could you run it in debug mode (one minute will be > enough) to check if this is indeed the case?
The logfile is attached; one with each version. >> Is there anything else I can do for you? > > You could try adding the 'pollonly' flag, but I'm afraid this isn't > going to help. I don't think we (the NUT developers) can do anything > about it. Not sure there, but I have added pollonly = 1 to ups.conf and restarted the driver. See what it does next week. Tom
usbhid-ups_2.4.1-DDD_old.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
usbhid-ups_2.4.1-2142-DDD_old.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
