On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:35:10AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > Accept any cxl_test topology device as the first argument in > cxl_chbs_context. This is in preparation for reworking the detection of > the component registers across VH and RCH topologies. Move > mock_acpi_table_parse_cedt() beneath the definition of is_mock_port() > and use is_mock_port() instead of the explicit mock cxl_acpi device > check.
I'll ACK this change, alhtough I don't appreciate the code move and modify in the same patch. It hides the diff. The commit msg seems needlessly vague. Why not state what was done? Something like: 'Accept any topology device in cxl_chbs_context' > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com> > --- > tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c | 80 > +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c b/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c > index facfcd11cb67..42a34650dd2f 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c > +++ b/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c > @@ -320,46 +320,6 @@ static int populate_cedt(void) > return 0; > } > > -/* > - * WARNING, this hack assumes the format of 'struct > - * cxl_cfmws_context' and 'struct cxl_chbs_context' share the property that > - * the first struct member is the device being probed by the cxl_acpi > - * driver. > - */ > -struct cxl_cedt_context { > - struct device *dev; > -}; > - > -static int mock_acpi_table_parse_cedt(enum acpi_cedt_type id, > - acpi_tbl_entry_handler_arg handler_arg, > - void *arg) > -{ > - struct cxl_cedt_context *ctx = arg; > - struct device *dev = ctx->dev; > - union acpi_subtable_headers *h; > - unsigned long end; > - int i; > - > - if (dev != &cxl_acpi->dev) > - return acpi_table_parse_cedt(id, handler_arg, arg); > - > - if (id == ACPI_CEDT_TYPE_CHBS) > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mock_cedt.chbs); i++) { > - h = (union acpi_subtable_headers *)&mock_cedt.chbs[i]; > - end = (unsigned long)&mock_cedt.chbs[i + 1]; > - handler_arg(h, arg, end); > - } > - > - if (id == ACPI_CEDT_TYPE_CFMWS) > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mock_cfmws); i++) { > - h = (union acpi_subtable_headers *) mock_cfmws[i]; > - end = (unsigned long) h + mock_cfmws[i]->header.length; > - handler_arg(h, arg, end); > - } > - > - return 0; > -} > - > static bool is_mock_bridge(struct device *dev) > { > int i; > @@ -410,6 +370,46 @@ static bool is_mock_port(struct device *dev) > return false; > } > > +/* > + * WARNING, this hack assumes the format of 'struct cxl_cfmws_context' > + * and 'struct cxl_chbs_context' share the property that the first > + * struct member is cxl_test device being probed by the cxl_acpi > + * driver. > + */ > +struct cxl_cedt_context { > + struct device *dev; > +}; > + > +static int mock_acpi_table_parse_cedt(enum acpi_cedt_type id, > + acpi_tbl_entry_handler_arg handler_arg, > + void *arg) > +{ > + struct cxl_cedt_context *ctx = arg; > + struct device *dev = ctx->dev; > + union acpi_subtable_headers *h; > + unsigned long end; > + int i; > + > + if (!is_mock_port(dev) && !is_mock_dev(dev)) > + return acpi_table_parse_cedt(id, handler_arg, arg); > + > + if (id == ACPI_CEDT_TYPE_CHBS) > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mock_cedt.chbs); i++) { > + h = (union acpi_subtable_headers *)&mock_cedt.chbs[i]; > + end = (unsigned long)&mock_cedt.chbs[i + 1]; > + handler_arg(h, arg, end); > + } > + > + if (id == ACPI_CEDT_TYPE_CFMWS) > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mock_cfmws); i++) { > + h = (union acpi_subtable_headers *) mock_cfmws[i]; > + end = (unsigned long) h + mock_cfmws[i]->header.length; > + handler_arg(h, arg, end); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int host_bridge_index(struct acpi_device *adev) > { > return adev - host_bridge; >