>> Should we use the word "oracle" in the ID? IMHO using a more generic term >> would be much better.
>Please suggest an alternative word. I believe the original proposals of this concept used the term "directory service" (see VL2 paper etc). Dimitri > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dhruv > Dhody > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 12:17 AM > To: 'Benson Schliesser'; [email protected] > Cc: 'Matthew (Matthew) Bocci'; draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [nvo3] call for adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem- > statement-02 > > Hi, > > Support! > > Here are a few comments/queries ... > > (1) Sec 2.2 > "A key requirement for live migration is that a VM retain > its IP address(es) and MAC address(es) in its new location > (to avoid tearing down existing communication)." > > IP address must be retained but couldn't live migration be still supported > if the MAC address of the VM changes in the routed semantics? > > > (2) Sec 3.3 > "The first component consists of a back-end "oracle" that > is responsible for distributing and maintaining the mapping > information for the entire overlay system." > > Should we use the word "oracle" in the ID? IMHO using a more generic term > would be much better. > > Regards, > Dhruv > > **************************************************************************** > *** > Dhruv Dhody, System Architect, Huawei Technologies, Bangalore, India, Ph. > +91-9845062422 > > This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, > which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed > above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, > but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or > dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is > prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by > phone or email immediately and delete it! > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Benson Schliesser > Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 6:31 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Matthew (Matthew) Bocci; > [email protected] > Subject: [nvo3] call for adoption: > draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-02 > > Dear NVO3 Participants - > > This message begins a two week Call for Adoption > of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-02 > by the NVO3 working group, ending on 30-June-2012. > > Please respond to the NVO3 mailing list with any statements of approval or > disapproval, along with any additional comments that might explain your > position. Also, if any NVO3 participant is aware of IPR associated with this > draft, please inform the mailing list and/or the NVO3 chairs. > > Thanks, > -Benson & Matthew > > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
