Fully agree. Lucy -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John E Drake Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 5:52 AM To: Yakov Rekhter; Benson Schliesser Cc: Matthew (Matthew) Bocci; Luyuan Fang (lufang); [email protected]; Dennis Cai (dcai); Pedro Marques; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [nvo3] call for adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-02
Benson, The WG has yet to have its first meeting and we have yet to see the drafts which will be presented at it. Generally, requirements and framework drafts adopted by the WG as WG drafts are a synthesis of many individual drafts, So, it is extremely premature to be adopting the subject draft as a WG draft. Thanks, John Sent from my iPhone >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >Yakov Rekhter >Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:44 AM >To: Benson Schliesser >Cc: Matthew (Matthew) Bocci; Luyuan Fang (lufang); [email protected]; Dennis >Cai (dcai); Pedro Marques; draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem- >[email protected]; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [nvo3] call for adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay- >problem-statement-02 > >Benson, > >> Dear NVO3 Participants - >> >> This message begins a two week Call for Adoption of >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement >> -02 by the NVO3 working group, ending on 30-June-2012. >> >> Please respond to the NVO3 mailing list with any statements of >> approval or disapproval, along with any additional comments that might >> explain your position. Also, if any NVO3 participant is aware of IPR >> associated with this draft, please inform the mailing list and/or the >NVO3 chairs. > >Before considering adoption of draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem- >statement, >we should consider how this draft is related to draft-fang-vpn4dc- >problem-statement (see below) ? Do these two drafts cover the same topic >? Are they complementary with each other ? >Should both of these drafts be merged into a single draft, before being >adopted by the NVO3 working group ? > >Yakov. > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:50:53 CDT >To: <[email protected]> >cc: Pedro Marques <[email protected]>, [email protected], > "Dennis Cai \(dcai\)" <[email protected]> >From: "Luyuan Fang (lufang)" <[email protected]> >Subject: [nvo3] FW: New Version Notification fordraft-fang-vpn4dc- >problem-sta > ***tement-01.txt > >Dear colleagues, > >We have uploaded a new updated version of draft-fang-vpn4dc-problem- >statement >-01.txt (on 6/12), by Maria Napierala, Dennis Cai, and myself. >Appreciate your review and comments. > >Thanks, >Luyuan > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:48 PM >To: Luyuan Fang (lufang) >Cc: [email protected]; Dennis Cai (dcai) >Subject: New Version Notification fordraft-fang-vpn4dc-problem- >statement-01.t >xt > > >A new version of I-D, draft-fang-vpn4dc-problem-statement-01.txt >has been successfully submitted by Luyuan Fang and posted to the >IETF repository. > >Filename: draft-fang-vpn4dc-problem-statement >Revision: 01 >Title: IP-VPN Data Center Problem Statement and Requirements >Creation date: 2012-06-12 >WG ID: Individual Submission >Number of pages: 18 >URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fang-vpn4dc- >proble >m-statement-01.txt >Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fang-vpn4dc- >problem-st >atement >Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/submission.filename }}-01 >Diff: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-fang-vpn4dc- >problem >-statement-01 > >Abstract: > Network Service Providers commonly use BGP/MPLS VPNs [RFC 4364] as > the control plane for virtual networks. This technology has proven > to scale to a large number of VPNs and attachment points, and it is > well suited for Data Center connectivity, especially when > supporting all IP applications. > > The Data Center environment presents new challenges and imposes > additional requirements to IP VPN technologies, including multi- > tenancy support, high scalability, VM mobility, security, and > orchestration. This document describes the problems and defines the > new requirements. > > > > > > >The IETF Secretariat >_______________________________________________ >nvo3 mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 >_______________________________________________ >nvo3 mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
