On 6/21/12 2:51 AM, John E Drake wrote:
The WG has yet to have its first meeting and we have yet to see the drafts which will be presented at it. Generally, requirements and framework drafts adopted by the WG as WG drafts are a synthesis of many individual drafts,
??? Generally, I don't think so. From time to time, to be sure, but "generally?" No. At any rate I think this draft is a very good starting point and it seems to me that unless there are *specific* reasons related to content or structure not to adopt the draft, I don't see a reason not to. Progressing a working group draft is a collaborative process and one, I think, that seems healthier and more likely to be able to result in a consensus to publish than having what's been referred to elsewhere as a "contest of champions." Do you have reasons to not want to adopt that have something to do with content? Melinda _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
