Hi John,
One ("organizational") comment is that since L3VPN is not only an
RFC but it has been widely deployed for 14 years, it should precede
the others mentioned in the proposed text.
JD: Totally irrelevant
I don't think this is irrelevant. If operational experience with pretty
mature technology which can address the problem at hand is not important
then what is ?
(and needs to include a reference to draft-marques-end-system).
JD: Why, other than you like the draft?
Because it proposes conversion of the L3VPN interface to the end host to
be host friendly.
So let me ask the reverse .. why not ? Because you do not like the draft
? Or because the draft does not help legacy vendors to be part of the pie ?
Best,
R.
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
