Linda,
Yes, we've talked about the difficulty in this area.
Fortunately, I was one of
the Co-Editors on a CCAMP draft that was similar (see RFC 6373).
Also, see the 2nd major bullet and its sub-bullets on slide 5
of the presentation
given at IETF 87 (in NVO3) -
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/slides/slides-87-nvo3-6.ppt
- where we point out deficiencies in the tabular format and how we hope to
address
them.
As has been pointed out, the draft is not expected to be a
finished product at
this point.
--
Eric
From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 5:51 PM
To: Eric Gray; Bocci, Matthew (Matthew); [email protected]
Subject: RE: [nvo3] Poll for adoption and IPR check:
draft-gbclt-nvo3-gap-analysis-00.txt
Importance: High
Eric,
I am a little confused of what to be adopted to WG draft. Most of table entries
of the draft are still empty.
Using tabular format to compare data plane requirement might work. But using
tabular format to compare control plane requirement is not so straight forward.
For example, can you show tabular format to compare with the following
requirement from "Network Virtualization NVE to NVA CP Reqs"?
[cid:[email protected]]
How to describe the "gap analysis" in the tabular format?
Linda
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Gray
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 1:50 PM
To: Bocci, Matthew (Matthew); [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Poll for adoption and IPR check:
draft-gbclt-nvo3-gap-analysis-00.txt
Support (as an Author).
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 9:57 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [nvo3] Poll for adoption and IPR check:
draft-gbclt-nvo3-gap-analysis-00.txt
This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs judge if there is
consensus to adopt draft-gbclt-nvo3-gap-analysis-00.txt as an NVO3 working
group draft.
Please respond to this email on the list with 'support' or 'do not support'.
Please also send any comments on the draft to the NVO3 list.
Please consider whether this draft takes the right basic approach to a gap
analysis, and is a good basis for the work going forward (and potential future
rechartering). It does not have to be perfect at this stage.
Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to
this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be
adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor.
If you are on the NVO3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR
that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
This poll closes on Friday 20th September.
Regards
Matthew and Benson
<<inline: image001.png>>
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
