yes/support Regards, Greg
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) < [email protected]> wrote: > This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs judge if there is > consensus to adopt draft-gbclt-nvo3-gap-analysis-00.txt as an NVO3 working > group draft. > > Please respond to this email on the list with 'support' or 'do not > support'. > > Please also send any comments on the draft to the NVO3 list. > > Please consider whether this draft takes the right basic approach to a > gap analysis, and is a good basis for the work going forward (and potential > future rechartering). It does not have to be perfect at this stage. > > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance > with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will > not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and > contributor. > > If you are on the NVO3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any > IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > This poll closes on Friday 20th September. > > Regards > > Matthew and Benson > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
