Support Adoption On Sep 13, 2013, at 1:20 PM, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> yes/support > > Regards, > Greg > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs judge if there is >> consensus to adopt draft-gbclt-nvo3-gap-analysis-00.txt as an NVO3 working >> group draft. >> >> Please respond to this email on the list with 'support' or 'do not support'. >> >> Please also send any comments on the draft to the NVO3 list. >> >> Please consider whether this draft takes the right basic approach to a gap >> analysis, and is a good basis for the work going forward (and potential >> future rechartering). It does not have to be perfect at this stage. >> >> Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to >> this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF >> IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this >> email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not >> be adopted until a response has been received from each author and >> contributor. >> >> If you are on the NVO3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or >> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR >> that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >> >> This poll closes on Friday 20th September. >> >> Regards >> >> Matthew and Benson >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nvo3 mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
