> Regarding to the protocol evolution, does this mean that nonce/map-version > features in LISP will be deprecated? IMO: Having the same field overloaded > for many difference purposes is not good way for the protocol evolution, it > becomes messy.
No it does not mean that. It means that the features need to be traded off. So the market/user-base will decide what it wants to use that field for. Dino _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
