+1

Lucy

-----Original Message-----
From: Xuxiaohu 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 10:07 PM
To: Paul Quinn (paulq); Lucy yong
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: re: [nvo3] New Version Notification for draft-quinn-vxlan-gpe-00.txt

Hi all,

First, I'm glad to see that more and more people have realized the need for a 
protocol type field in the VXLAN header since I mentioned that need one year 
ago 
(http://list-archives.org/2012/09/21/nvo3-ietf-org/unified-encapsulation-headers-for-both-layer2-and-layer3-vpn-overlays/f/6013985816).

Second, I guess most people who have realized the above need would agree that 
the protocol type field would be a necessary field (like the Protocol Type 
field in the GRE header), rather than an optional field (like the Checksum 
field in the GRE header) in the long run. Both the usage of P bit as described 
in your draft and the interpretation of 0x0000 in the Protocol Type field as 
Ethernet payload as described in our draft are just intended for backward 
compatibility to the early implementation of the pre-standard VXLAN. In order 
to reduce the potential risk of compatibility in the future, I feel it'd better 
for the NVo3 WG to make an early decision upon such extension to VXLAN before 
the WG adoption of the existing VXLAN data format. 

Best regards,
Xiaohu


> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Paul 
> Quinn (paulq)
> 发送时间: 2013年9月10日 10:03
> 收件人: Lucy yong
> 抄送: [email protected]
> 主题: Re: [nvo3] New Version Notification for 
> draft-quinn-vxlan-gpe-00.txt
> 
> Lucy,
> 
> Thank you for your comments.
> 
> The P bit provides much needed flexibility for the protocol.  First 
> and foremost, it enables the creation of a single on the wire protocol 
> that encompasses both VXLAN and LISP (please see 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-lisp-gpe-00 for the associated 
> LISP draft).  The P bit also enables the evolution of the protocol, allowing 
> the format to change as needed with a simple bit change.
> 
> Thank you,
> Paul
> 
> 
> On Sep 6, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Lucy yong <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > I read this draft. Both this draft and our draft
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yong-l3vpn-nvgre-vxlan-encap/ 
> propose adding prototype type field in VXLAN header in supporting L3 
> overlays (or other) beside L2 overlays. The only difference between 
> two is that this draft requests using P bit to indicate the presence 
> of protocol type field in VXLAN header. We don't think this is 
> necessary. For the backward compatibility, we propose treating protocol type 
> value 0 as Ethernet payload.
> >
> > This draft gives two ways to do L2 overlay. If P bit is set and 
> > protocol type
> value 0x6558, L2 payload is follow, or P bit is unset, L2 payload is 
> follow. IMHO, this is bad.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lucy
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
> > Of
> Paul Quinn (paulq)
> > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 5:04 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [nvo3] Fwd: New Version Notification for 
> > draft-quinn-vxlan-gpe-00.txt
> >
> > FYI for the group.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >>
> >> A new version of I-D, draft-quinn-vxlan-gpe-00.txt has been 
> >> successfully submitted by Paul Quinn and posted to the IETF 
> >> repository.
> >>
> >> Filename:   draft-quinn-vxlan-gpe
> >> Revision:   00
> >> Title:              Generic Protocol Extension for VXLAN
> >> Creation date:      2013-08-27
> >> Group:              Individual Submission
> >> Number of pages: 13
> >> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-quinn-vxlan-gpe-00.txt
> >> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quinn-vxlan-gpe
> >> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-quinn-vxlan-gpe-00
> >>
> >>
> >> Abstract:
> >>  This draft describes a mechanism for adding multi-protocol support 
> >> to  Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN).  Protocol  
> >> identification is carried in the VXLAN header and is used to 
> >> describe  the encapsulated payload.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
> >> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
> >> tools.ietf.org.
> >>
> >> The IETF Secretariat
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nvo3 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to