Hello, authors
I have no objections to this adaptation. But I really prefer authors
can make a clarifications on the scope of the draft. The terminologies used in
the draft are not in line with the framework draft. The text in the
introduction section is very confused. If I understand the draft correctly, the
control protocol is between the NVE and the device where the TS hold. This
covers the case where the VM is running on top of a hypervisor or on the server
without a hypervisor. And the protocol is only used to report to the NVE about
the TS (e.g. VM) statues (e.g. connection or disconnection). The configuration
data (e.g. inner-outer address mapping table) is retrieved using NVA-NVE
interface, not the hypervisor-NVE interface. Is that right understanding?
Have a nice day
Zu Qiang
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew
>(Matthew)
>Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 9:23 AM
>To: NVO3
>Subject: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption of draft-yizhou-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-
>00
>
>This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs determine if there is
>consensus to adopt draft-yizhou-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-00 as an PWE3
>working group draft.
>
>The draft can be found here:
>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yizhou-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-00.txt
>
>Please read the draft and indicate to the list if you support adoption, or if
>you
>do not support adoption (giving reasons).
>
>Please note that this is only a call for adoption. There needs to be consensus
>that this draft is a good basis for the work, but it does not need to be
>perfect
>at this stage.
>
>Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to
>this
>draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
>email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be
>adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor.
>
>If you are on the PWE3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or
>contributor, then please explicitly respond regarding IPR only if you are aware
>of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>The poll for adoption will close in two weeks time, on Friday 6th June.
>
>Matthew and Benson
>
>_______________________________________________
>nvo3 mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
