Hi Anoop, Thank you for the great comments. Yes, the requirement should apply to both L2 and L3 connectivity. We will make that clear in next version. Yes, we should not give the detail solution in requirement draft, will fix that too.
Thanks, Lucy From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anoop Ghanwani Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 6:53 PM To: NVO3 Subject: Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption of draft-yizhou-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-00 This looks like a reasonable starting point. But I have some comments... The document seems to focus only on the case where the TS to NVE is accomplished using L2 connectivity. Is there a reason it chooses to exclude L3 connectivity? If so, what is the rationale for that? It would be good to document that. Second, it talks about the case where a TS forwards using multiple MAC addresses and requires the registration of all of the MAC addresses. But what about the case where the TS is a transparent appliance? In that case, it may not have MAC addresses to register and may operate simply by flipping the VLAN ID. Finally, being a requirements document, it shouldn't discuss solution, yet it gets into defining state machines and provides the exemplary details of VDP (but no details for any of the other solutions). Anoop -----Original Message----- From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 6:23 AM To: NVO3 Subject: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption of draft-yizhou-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-00 This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs determine if there is consensus to adopt draft-yizhou-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-00 as an PWE3 working group draft. The draft can be found here: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yizhou-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-00.txt Please read the draft and indicate to the list if you support adoption, or if you do not support adoption (giving reasons). Please note that this is only a call for adoption. There needs to be consensus that this draft is a good basis for the work, but it does not need to be perfect at this stage. Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the PWE3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond regarding IPR only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The poll for adoption will close in two weeks time, on Friday 6th June. Matthew and Benson _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
