This looks like a reasonable starting point. But I have some comments...
The document seems to focus only on the case where the TS to NVE is accomplished using L2 connectivity. Is there a reason it chooses to exclude L3 connectivity? If so, what is the rationale for that? It would be good to document that. Second, it talks about the case where a TS forwards using multiple MAC addresses and requires the registration of all of the MAC addresses. But what about the case where the TS is a transparent appliance? In that case, it may not have MAC addresses to register and may operate simply by flipping the VLAN ID. Finally, being a requirements document, it shouldn't discuss solution, yet it gets into defining state machines and provides the exemplary details of VDP (but no details for any of the other solutions). Anoop > > -----Original Message----- > From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew > (Matthew) > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 6:23 AM > To: NVO3 > Subject: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption of > draft-yizhou-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-00 > > This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs determine if there is > consensus to adopt draft-yizhou-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-00 as an PWE3 working > group draft. > > The draft can be found here: > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yizhou-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-00.txt > > Please read the draft and indicate to the list if you support adoption, or > if you do not support adoption (giving reasons). > > Please note that this is only a call for adoption. There needs to be > consensus that this draft is a good basis for the work, but it does not > need to be perfect at this stage. > > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies > to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will > not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and > contributor. > > If you are on the PWE3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond regarding IPR only if you are > aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF > rules. > > The poll for adoption will close in two weeks time, on Friday 6th June. > > Matthew and Benson > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
