Dave,

It's not really what we think of as a "framework" document, as it contains
normative language, framework documents are usually informative in nature
and used to set the stage for solution drafts.

I also agree with Tom that it's more about address mobility than just VM
mobility, which is an instance of address mobility.

I prefer the very simple title "NVO3 Address Mobility".

Cheers,
Andy

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:59 PM, David Allan I <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  IMO “EVPN VM mobility framework” would be a significantly more accurate
> title…
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> *From:* nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Linda Dunbar
> *Sent:* Monday, October 06, 2014 12:41 PM
> *To:* Tom Herbert
> *Cc:* Black, David; [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [nvo3] Poll for a better name for
> draft-merged-nvo3-vm-mobility-scheme-00.txt
>
>
>
> Tom,
>
> Are you saying that the term “VM” should only be described in motivation
> and the proposed scheme should work for address mobility enabled by any
> methods?
>
>
>
> Linda
>
>
>
> *From:* nvo3 [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Tom Herbert
> *Sent:* Monday, October 06, 2014 2:16 PM
>
> While it's a better title, I think my comment was meant to be more
> general. VMs (and hypervisors) are references to specific mechanisms of
> server virtualization, but not the only mechanisms that can be deployed
> (e.g. container virtualization is not normally a VM and does not have an
> explicit hypervisor). VM is really just one use case of network
> virtualization and not in itself a networking term, so I think that
> mechanisms or protocols for network virtualization really should be
> described without reference to VMs unless there really is something VM
> specific about that.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Tom
>
>
> > Anyone has better suggestions?
> >
> >
> > Thank, Linda
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Black, David
> > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 8:15 PM
> > To: Tom Herbert
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [nvo3] FW: New Version Notification for
> draft-merged-nvo3-vm-mobility-scheme-00.txt
> >
> >> I would suggest that "Address mobility scheme" might be a better
> >> title. VM migration is one instance of when we need address mobility,
> >> but we'll need this in with container migration or when we just want
> >> to move an virtual address between servers.
> >
> > I agree, and I think Larry pointed this out earlier.
> >
> >> Also, w.r.t. VM or
> >> container migration, addresses are not the only networking state we
> >> need to consider, we need consider how to move connection state (e.g.
> >> open TCP connections bond to the address being moved)-- this seems to
> >> be out of scope for this draft.
> >
> > OTOH, I would caution about getting too involved in this as both ends of
> the spectrum of connection state preservation are reasonable and used in
> practice:
> >
> > - VM live migration preserves TCP connections and the like.
> > - IP address takeover on hardware failure doesn't preserve
> >         anything whose state was solely on the hardware that's now a
> >         smoking pile of parts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --David
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Tom Herbert [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 9:04 PM
> >> To: Linda Dunbar
> >> Cc: [email protected]; Larry Kreeger (kreeger); Black, David
> >> Subject: Re: [nvo3] FW: New Version Notification for
> >> draft-merged-nvo3-vm- mobility-scheme-00.txt
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > As NVO3 new charter encourage solutions proposals, we added more
> >> comprehensive solutions for the issues described in the
> >> draft-ietf-nvo3-vm- mobility-issues. We now call it
> "draft-merged-nvo3-vm-mobility-scheme-00"
> >> >
> >> I would suggest that "Address mobility scheme" might be a better
> >> title. VM migration is one instance of when we need address mobility,
> >> but we'll need this in with container migration or when we just want
> >> to move an virtual address between servers. Also, w.r.t. VM or
> >> container migration, addresses are not the only networking state we
> >> need to consider, we need consider how to move connection state (e.g.
> >> open TCP connections bond to the address being moved)-- this seems to
> >> be out of scope for this draft.
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> > Comments and suggestions are greatly appreciated.
> >> >
> >> > Linda
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 12:18 PM
> >> > To: Rahul Aggarwal; Wim Henderickx; Ravi Shekhar; Luyuan Fang; Linda
> >> > Dunbar;
> >> Rahul Aggarwal; Luyuan Fang; Wim Henderickx; Ravi Shekhar; Yakov
> >> Rekhter; Yakov Rekhter; Linda Dunbar; Ali Sajassi; Ali Sajassi
> >> > Subject: New Version Notification for
> >> > draft-merged-nvo3-vm-mobility-scheme-
> >> 00.txt
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > A new version of I-D, draft-merged-nvo3-vm-mobility-scheme-00.txt
> >> > has been successfully submitted by Linda Dunbar and posted to the
> >> > IETF
> >> repository.
> >> >
> >> > Name:           draft-merged-nvo3-vm-mobility-scheme
> >> > Revision:       00
> >> > Title:          NVO3 VM Mobility Scheme
> >> > Document date:  2014-10-03
> >> > Group:          Individual Submission
> >> > Pages:          24
> >> > URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-merged-nvo3-vm-
> >> mobility-scheme-00.txt
> >> > Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merged-nvo3-vm-
> >> mobility-scheme/
> >> > Htmlized:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-merged-nvo3-vm-mobility-
> >> scheme-00
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Abstract:
> >> >    This document describes the schemes to overcome the network-related
> >> >    issues to achieve seamless Virtual Machine mobility in the data
> >> >    center and between data centers.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> >> > submission
> >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >> >
> >> > The IETF Secretariat
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > nvo3 mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> > _______________________________________________
> > nvo3 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to